Optimized Controller Provisioning in Software-Defined LEO Satellite Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The controller provisioning, which adjusts the number, locations, and members of satellite controllers adaptive to the dynamic network load and topology, fundamentally impacts the performance of software-defined satellite networks (SDSNs). An ideal provisioning strategy should achieve a low total control overhead throughout the entire satellite operation period, which is extremely challenging since the network loadcan only be predicted in a short time scale. Existing methods can hardly achieve this goal for they greedily configure controllers in each time slot, where switches have to frequently migrate from one controller to another. In this paper, we focus on achievingglobally optimized strategieswith onlycurrent network load information. We first propose a comprehensive control overhead model and formulate theControllerProvisioningProblem (CPP)in SDSNs as a non-convex integer programming problem. To solve the problem, we propose an approximate algorithm named AROA by introducing a regularization framework and based on randomized rounding. We theoretically derive its competitive ratio. To produce strategies in time for future large satellite constellations, we further propose a more efficient heuristic algorithm HROA. Evaluations on our built simulation system show that our proposed methods significantly outperform related schemes in control overhead, latency, and scalability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".