MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220675784 · doi:10.32866/001c.33160

Ride-hailing through the COVID-19 Pandemic in New York City

2022· article· en· W4220675784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFindings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicAviation Industry Analysis and Trends
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakNegative binomial distributionTRIPS architectureSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)GeographyDemographySocioeconomicsMedicineStatisticsVirologyOutbreakMathematicsEconomicsEngineeringTransport engineeringSociologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explored the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ride hailing trips in New York City between February 1, 2019 and July 31, 2021. Using negative binomial regression models, we quantified the effects of COVID-19 indicators on daily ride hailing trip counts. We found that a 1% increase in the number of new cases and vaccines administered were associated with 16.0% decrease and 0.8% increase in trip counts, respectively. Since the initial drop of 258.2% during the stay-at-home phase of the pandemic, trip counts recovered in the subsequent phases albeit still lower than pre-pandemic levels at -85.0% and -38.7% during the reopening and vaccination phases, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it