MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220693281 · doi:10.18280/ria.360104

An Efficient Swift Routing Model with Node Trust Identity Factor (SRM-NTIF) to Perform Secure Data Transmission Among IoT Gadgets

2022· article· en· W4220693281 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSecurity in Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkNode (physics)Routing protocolThe InternetWireless networkRouting (electronic design automation)Computer securityWirelessTelecommunicationsWorld Wide WebEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

According to a United Nations survey, the number of users using the internet has increased to 3 billion in recent years. The Auto-ID Center is a research organisation that coined the word "Internet of Things" (IoT) a decade ago, describing how it utilises wired or wireless networking technologies to create a channel of communication among technologies and networks available over the Internet. Despite the fact that a swing of routing protocols has been proposed in the literature, safe and energy-efficient routing protocol is still a work in progress. Many routing protocols expressly designed for resource limited wireless devices take the same approach and have nearly achieved their full improvements. The Internet of Things (IoT) has recently gained prominence as a result of the increasing number of connected devices being used in everyday human life with network lifetime constraints. Routing expertise is essential for establishing communication between nodes. A node should be capable of self-learning, self-configuring, and self-managing by gathering local knowledge and sharing it with its neighbours. The degree of trust determines the degree of cooperation between scattered mobile nodes. The term "trust" refers to a level of assurance based on node behavior. To ensure secure and proper data transmission in IoT network, the trust level of the nodes is calculated based on node behaviour. Because of the unexpected changes in the network structure, the complex existence of IoT network, and the underived prior trust relationship between the nodes, trust computation in IoT network is a difficult task. All IoT nodes willing to engage in data transmission are given a Digital Unique Identifier (DUI), and the proposed model must define their trust identity factors. Using the DUI, the proposed Swift Routing Model with Node Trust Identity Factor (SRM-NTIF) model, node authentication is performed to verify natural and malicious nodes in the network. The proposed model is compared with the traditional methods and the results show that the proposed model performance is better in security and trust levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it