Rethinking Doppler Effect for Accurate Velocity Estimation With Commodity WiFi Devices
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enabling pervasive WiFi devices with non-contact sensing capability is an important topic in the field of integrated sensing and communication. Doppler effect has been widely exploited to estimate targets’ velocity from wireless signals. However, the separation of signal sources and receivers complicates the relationship between Doppler frequency shift (DFS) and target velocity in WiFi-based non-contact sensing systems. In contrast to existing works that rely on either approximated relations or coarse-grained information such as whether a target is moving toward or away from WiFi transceivers, this paper investigates rigorously the dependency of velocity estimation accuracy on target locations and headings in WiFi sensing systems. The theoretical insights allow us to derive a closed-form solution and understand the fundamental limitation of velocity estimation. To optimize velocity estimation performance, we devise a receiving device selection scheme that dynamically chooses the optimal set of receivers among multiple available WiFi devices. A prototype real-time target tracking system has been implemented using commodity WiFi devices. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed system outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in velocity estimation and tracking, and is able to achieve <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$9.38cm/s$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , 13.42°, <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$31.08cm$ </tex-math></inline-formula> median errors in speed, heading and location estimation amongst experiments conducted in three indoor environments with three device placements and eight human subjects over 15 trajectories.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it