The development of an instrument to predict patients’ adoption of mHealth in the developing world
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: There are many tools for measuring patient's potential adoption of mHealth (i.e. mobile health) in the developed world, but none of these instruments provides a comprehensive means for measuring critical issues affecting the adoption of mHealth by patients in the developing world. The aim of this paper was to develop a valid and reliable assessment instrument for predicting mHealth adoption by patients in the developing world. Method: A Patients mHealth Technology Adoption Questionnaire (PmTAQ) was developed based on themes identified through a prior published structured literature review of factors affecting patients' mHealth adoption in the developing world, from which eight constructs evolved. Face and content validity was confirmed by 15 mothers who had used mHealth (the Mobile Technology for Community Health (MoTeCH) service) for maternal care, and the findings were used to improve the instrument. To assess the validity and reliability of the instrument at least 64 mothers who used MoTeCH were randomly selected from each of nine clusters of health posts in one district in Ghana. The assessment instrument consisted of 39 items, categorised under eight components: Cost and ownership, user characteristics, language and literacy, infrastructure, collaboration and funding, governance, system utility, and intention to adopt. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. Results: The data from 585 mothers were analysed. Exploratory factor analysis showed the eigenvalue of all eight components to be significant (cumulative total greater than 1.0). Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value was 0.84 and the mean Cronbach's α value was 0.82 (range 0.81-0.83). The components were found to be valid. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all indices for the measurement model were within acceptable limit leading to the use of structural equation modelling to show the causal relationship between components, resulting in the development of the mHealth Adoption Impact Model (mAIM). The mAIM shows a strong relationship between latent constructs for patients' mHealth adoption. Conclusion: The study presents an evidence-based, reliable and valid instrument and model for application in future research, policy development, and implementations related to patient mHealth adoption in the developing world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".