Relationship between Time of Day of Medical Emergency Team Activations and Outcomes of Hospitalized Pediatric Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study was conducted to investigate whether outcomes of medical emergency team (MET) activations differ by time of day of hospitalized pediatric patients. This is a retrospective cohort study conduct at a tertiary pediatric hospital. Data were extracted from the charts of 846 patients (with one or more MET activations) over a 5-year period. Also can remove hospital names and affiliated institution from the body of the text as readers can find this information in the author list. Patients included children <18 years, admitted to a pediatric ward, who experienced a MET activation between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020. We excluded patients reviewed by the MET during a routine follow-up, planned pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admissions from the ward, and MET activation in out-patient settings, post-anesthesia care unit, and neonatal intensive care unit. There was no intervention. A total of 1,230 MET encounters were included as part of the final analysis. Daytime (08:00–15:59) MET activation was associated with increased PICU admission (25.3%, p = 0.04). There was some evidence of a higher proportion of critical deterioration events (CDEs) during daytime MET activation; however, this did not reach statistical significance (24%, p = 0.09). The highest MET dosage occurred during the evening hours, 16:00 to 23:59 (15/1,000 admissions), and it was lowest overnight, 00:00 to 07:59 (8.8/1,000 admissions, p < 0.001). This period of lowest MET dosage immediately preceded the highest likelihood of PICU admission (08:00, 37.5%) and CDE (09:00, 30.2%). Following the period of lowest MET activity overnight, MET activations during early daytime hours were associated with the highest likelihood of unplanned PICU admission and CDEs. This work identifies potential high-risk periods for undetected critical deterioration and targets for future quality improvement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".