MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220762418 · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2035060

Implications of Islamic women’s mobilizations in Egypt

2022· article· en· W4220762418 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobalizations · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsRoyal Roads University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIslamPolitical sciencePolitical economyEconomyDevelopment economicsEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses widely held views about Middle East and North African (MENA) activists with a focus on Islamic women’s activism in Egypt and their mobilizations. Employing Carole McGranahan’s concept of refusal, this article adds to the literature on activism to illustrate how Islamic women’s activism in Egypt contribute to a richer understanding of activism. They are studied extensively pre-uprisings and immediately after the uprisings. By applying the concept of refusal, this article sheds light on the assumption that activists’ positioning in states of authoritarian rule invariably reduces the status of such actors to ‘subjects’, when they are actually citizens engendering change. The article argues that, particularly in light of growing economic challenges, Islamic women’s activism has taken a new form, one that is generative, productive, and potentially empowering.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it