MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220794433 · doi:10.1142/s2424786321410139

Impact of AI on employment in manufacturing industry

2022· article· en· W4220794433 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Financial Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLabor market dynamics and wage inequality
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManufacturingMatching (statistics)Industrial RevolutionIndustrial organizationCompetition (biology)Construct (python library)BusinessManufacturing engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringMarketingPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the most significant technological revolution since we entered the 21st century. It has become a new focus of public attention and international competition. Industrial integration with AI technology not only brings vast opportunities for transformation and upgrading of enterprises but also has an impact on employment structure. Focusing on the fusion of the manufacturing industry integrating AI, we analyze the integration progress of AI and segmented manufacturing industries, describe a supply-and-demand situation of labor market with different skills, and discuss the impact of AI technology on manufacturing employment theoretically. Then we construct the propensity score matching–difference-in-difference model, divide intelligent manufacturing enterprises into various categories, and inspect the influences on the employment structure of different segmented manufacturing enterprises before and after integrating AI technology. Finally, we put forward efficient methods of transformation and upgrading of manufacturing enterprises and practical suggestions to solve problems on employment structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.763
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it