Deep learning-driven prediction of drug mechanism of action from large-scale chemical-genetic interaction profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: Chemical-genetic interaction profiling is a genetic approach that quantifies the susceptibility of a set of mutants depleted in specific gene product(s) to a set of chemical compounds. With the recent advances in artificial intelligence, chemical-genetic interaction profiles (CGIPs) can be leveraged to predict mechanism of action of compounds. This can be achieved by using machine learning, where the data from a CGIP is fed into the machine learning platform along with the chemical descriptors to develop a chemogenetically trained model. As small molecules can be considered non-structural data, graph convolutional neural networks, which can learn from the chemical structures directly, can be used to successfully predict molecular properties. Clustering analysis, on the other hand, is a critical approach to get insights into the underlying biological relationships between the gene products in the high-dimensional chemical-genetic data. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we proposed a comprehensive framework based on the large-scale chemical-genetics dataset built in Mycobacterium tuberculosis for predicting CGIPs using graph-based deep learning models. Our approach is structured into three parts. First, by matching M. tuberculosis genes with homologous genes in Escherichia coli (E. coli) according to their gene products, we grouped the genes into clusters with distinct biological functions. Second, we employed a directed message passing neural network to predict growth inhibition against M. tuberculosis gene clusters using a collection of 50,000 chemicals with the profile. We compared the performance of different baseline models and implemented multi-label tasks in binary classification frameworks. Lastly, we applied the trained model to an externally curated drug set that had experimental results against M. tuberculosis genes to examine the effectiveness of our method. Overall, we demonstrate that our approach effectively created M. tuberculosis gene clusters, and the trained classifier is able to predict activity against essential M. tuberculosis targets with high accuracy. CONCLUSION: This work provides an analytical framework for modeling large-scale chemical-genetic datasets for predicting CGIPs and generating hypothesis about mechanism of action of novel drugs. In addition, this work highlights the importance of graph-based deep neural networks in drug discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".