MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220890517 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2022.3161499

Algorithm/Hardware Codesign for Real-Time On-Satellite CNN-Based Ship Detection in SAR Imagery

2022· article· en· W4220890517 on OpenAlexaff
Geng Yang, Jie Lei, Weiying Xie, Zhenman Fang, Yunsong Li, Jiaxuan Wang, Xin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi ProvinceFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkSynthetic aperture radarField-programmable gate arraySatellite imageryArtificial intelligenceSatelliteDeep learningLeverage (statistics)Object detectionFeature (linguistics)Computer visionReal-time computingComputer hardwareRemote sensingPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, the convolutional neural network (CNN)-based approach for on-satellite ship detection in synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images has received increasing attention since it does not rely on predefined imagery features and distributions that are required in conventional detection methods. To achieve high detection accuracy, most of the existing CNN-based methods leverage complex off-the-shelf CNN models for optical imagery. Unfortunately, this usually leads to expensive computational cost, which is hard to process in real time using resource-constrained devices deployed in the harsh satellite environment. In this article, we propose OSCAR-RT, the first end-to-end algorithm/hardware codesign framework for real-time on-satellite CNN-based SAR ship detection, which can simultaneously produce an accurate and hardware-friendly CNN model and an ultraefficient field-programmable gate array (FPGA)-based hardware accelerator that can be deployed on satellites. With the real-time on-satellite processing speed in mind, we start from a state-of-the-art compact CNN model for optical imagery. To eliminate the sharp decrease in the detection accuracy for SAR imagery, we analyze the discrepancy between the SAR domain and optical domain and propose to adapt the model by adjusting the output feature size to better detect relatively smaller objects in SAR imagery. To improve the detection speed, we propose to develop a fully pipelined interlayer streaming accelerator architecture, where all the layers of the CNN model can be concurrently processed using on-chip FPGA resources. To achieve this architecture, we first propose a hardware-guided, progressive, and structural pruning strategy, which is guided by our modeled hardware metrics and applies state-of-the-art coarse-grained and fine-grained filter pruning as well as mixed-precision quantization techniques. Moreover, to improve the reusability and portability of the hardware accelerator design, we develop a library of highly optimized CNN components in high-level synthesis, together with their performance and resource models. Finally, we map the pruned CNN model onto these hardware library components in a fully pipelined interlayer streaming fashion, by adjusting their parallelism factors to balance the execution of each layer and fit into the resource constraint. Experimental results using the adapted MobileNetV1, MobileNetV2, and SqueezeNet models on the widely used SAR ship detection dataset (SSDD) demonstrate the effectiveness of OSCAR-RT; for the MobileNetV1 model, it achieves an average precision of 94%, a detection speed of 652 frames/s on the Xilinx VC709 FPGA evaluation board while consuming about 5.8-W power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote SensingSame topicAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207