Cross-sectional and longitudinal Biomarker extraction and analysis for multicentre FLAIR brain MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI has emerged as an important sequence for the analysis of cerebrovascular (CVD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Large-scale, automated cross-sectional and longitudinal cerebral biomarker extraction from FLAIR datasets could progress disease characterization, improve disease monitoring, and help to determine optimal intervention times. Despite this, most automated biomarker extraction algorithms are designed for T1-weighted or multi-modal inputs. In this work, automated tools were used to extract biomarkers from large, FLAIR-only datasets to evaluate the feasibility of this sequence to characterize healthy, AD, and CVD subjects in a similar manner to traditional approaches. Total brain volume (TBV), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volume, and white matter lesion (WML) volume was measured for the cross-sectional biomarkers and the corresponding annual rates of change over multiple scans represented the longitudinal biomarkers. Biomarkers were extracted from two dementia cohorts (4356 vol, 162 233 images) and one vascular disease cohort (869 vol, 42 850 images) using deep learning-based segmentation algorithms designed specifically for FLAIR. Biomarkers from all cohorts were summarized using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and ANCOVA to assess differences in diagnostic labels while accounting for demographic and acquisition factors. Biomarkers from FLAIR MRI had similar trends with those extracted from traditional modalities in the literature for characterizing healthy, AD, and CVD subjects. This demonstrates that FLAIR MRI can be used for end-to-end analysis of large AD and CVD datasets, which can lower acquisition costs, simplify clinical translation, and reduce measurement error associated with multi-modal approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".