MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220899186 · doi:10.1159/000522329

Assessing Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease by Magnetic Resonance Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping Combined Voxel-Wise and Radiomic Analysis

2022· article· en· W4220899186 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Neurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPutamenMontreal Cognitive AssessmentGlobus pallidusParkinson's diseaseSubstantia nigraCaudate nucleusHippocampusRed nucleusQuantitative susceptibility mappingPsychologyMagnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineMedicineNeuroscienceCognitionCentral nervous systemCognitive impairmentBasal gangliaDiseaseRadiologyNucleus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The relationship between iron accumulation in the central nervous system and cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease (PD) has not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to explore the value of quantitative susceptibility mapping in assessment of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in PD. METHODS: Sixteen PD patients with MCI (PD-MCI), sixteen normal cognition PD patients (PD-NC), and 28 healthy controls (HCs) were included. The differences in the magnetic susceptibility and Radiomic indicators among groups and their correlations with Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Basic (MoCA-B) scores and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (UPDRS-III) were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance. RESULTS: Higher iron deposition was observed in the cortical and subcortical structures of the PD patients compared with HCs, including limbic system, orbitofrontal cortex, cuneus, red nucleus, and substantia nigra. Combined magnetic susceptibility and texture index in hippocampus achieved the best diagnostic performance (area under curves: 0.828) in differentiating PD-MCI from PD-NC. The magnetic susceptibilities of the substantia nigra, red nucleus, putamen, globus pallidus, hippocampus, and thalamus were negatively correlated with the MoCA-B scores (all p < 0.05), and of the putamen and amygdala were positively correlated with the UPDRS-III scores (both p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher iron deposition was observed in the cortical and subcortical structures of the PD-MCI and PD-NC groups. The susceptibility values of vulnerable brain subregions shown significant correlation with MoCA-B and UPDRS-III. Together with the texture index, magnetic susceptibility values could provide robust performance in distinguishing PD-MCI patients from PD-NC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it