Appearance-Motion United Auto-Encoder Framework for Video Anomaly Detection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The key to video anomaly detection is understanding the appearance and motion differences between normal and abnormal events. However, previous works either considered the characteristics of appearance or motion in isolation or treated them without distinction, making the model fail to exploit the unique characteristics of both. In this brief, we propose an appearance-motion united auto-encoder (AMAE) framework to jointly learn the prototypical spatial and temporal patterns of normal events. The AMAE framework includes a spatial auto-encoder to learn appearance normality, a temporal auto-encoder to learn motion normality, and a channel attention-based spatial-temporal decoder to fuse the spatial-temporal features. The experimental results on standard benchmarks demonstrate the validity of the united appearance-motion normality learning. The proposed AMAE framework outperforms the state-of-the-art methods with AUCs of 97.4%, 88.2%, and 73.6% on the UCSD Ped2, CUHK Avenue, and ShanghaiTech datasets, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it