Simulation-based optimization of pump scheduling for drinking water distribution systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient Water Distribution Systems (WDSs) are crucial for modern society. Their operation requires large amounts of energy with significant financial impact for the utility providers. Existing solution methods are often oversimplified and can only solve the problem for very small, schematic networks. This article studies a pumping scheduling problem for WDSs in which, besides scheduling the operation of pumps over a planning horizon, several constraints regarding hydraulic properties are considered. The goal is to provide a pumping plan of minimum cost that satisfies all demand and respects operational and hydraulic constraints. This work proposes a nonlinear and non-convex formulation as well as a high-performance heuristic. The physical hydraulic behaviour is ensured via hydraulic simulation software. The present method significantly improved the best solutions for several benchmark instances by up to 17%. The solutions also reduce the energy consumed during peak periods, when the electrical grid is most strained.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it