MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220966911 · doi:10.1145/3502727

Stochastic Variational Optimization of a Hierarchical Dirichlet Process Latent Beta-Liouville Topic Model

2022· article· en· W4220966911 on OpenAlexaff
Koffi Eddy Ihou, Manar Amayri, Nizar Bouguila

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatent Dirichlet allocationDirichlet processHierarchical Dirichlet processTopic modelComputer scienceMeasure (data warehouse)Dirichlet distributionInferencePrior probabilityParametric statisticsBayesian inferencePosterior probabilityMathematicsBayesian probabilityApplied mathematicsArtificial intelligenceData miningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In topic models, collections are organized as documents where they arise as mixtures over latent clusters called topics. A topic is a distribution over the vocabulary. In large-scale applications, parametric or finite topic mixture models such as LDA (latent Dirichlet allocation) and its variants are very restrictive in performance due to their reduced hypothesis space. In this article, we address the problem related to model selection and sharing ability of topics across multiple documents in standard parametric topic models. We propose as an alternative a BNP (Bayesian nonparametric) topic model where the HDP (hierarchical Dirichlet process) prior models documents topic mixtures through their multinomials on infinite simplex. We, therefore, propose asymmetric BL (Beta-Liouville) as a diffuse base measure at the corpus level DP (Dirichlet process) over a measurable space. This step illustrates the highly heterogeneous structure in the set of all topics that describes the corpus probability measure. For consistency in posterior inference and predictive distributions, we efficiently characterize random probability measures whose limits are the global and local DPs to approximate the HDP from the stick-breaking formulation with the GEM (Griffiths-Engen-McCloskey) random variables. Due to the diffuse measure with the BL prior as conjugate to the count data distribution, we obtain an improved version of the standard HDP that is usually based on symmetric Dirichlet (Dir). In addition, to improve coordinate ascent framework while taking advantage of its deterministic nature, our model implements an online optimization method based on stochastic, at document level, variational inference to accommodate fast topic learning when processing large collections of text documents with natural gradient. The high value in the predictive likelihood per document obtained when compared to the performance of its competitors is also consistent with the robustness of our fully asymmetric BL-based HDP. While insuring the predictive accuracy of the model using the probability of the held-out documents, we also added a combination of metrics such as the topic coherence and topic diversity to improve the quality and interpretability of the topics discovered. We also compared the performance of our model using these metrics against the standard symmetric LDA. We show that online HDP-LBLA (Latent BL Allocation)’s performance is the asymptote for parametric topic models. The accuracy in the results (improved predictive distributions of the held out) is a product of the model’s ability to efficiently characterize dependency between documents (topic correlation) as now they can easily share topics, resulting in a much robust and realistic compression algorithm for information modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from DataSame topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207