New Methods for Predicting Strain Demand of Arctic Gas Pipelines across Permafrost under Frost Heave Displacement
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With increasing gas resource development in the Arctic region, gas pipeline installations in permafrost regions are becoming important. Frost heave of pipeline foundation soils may occur when a chilled gas pipeline passes through unfrozen areas with frost-susceptible soils. The stress and strain behaviors caused by the differential frost heave will directly affect the safety of the pipeline. A nonlinear finite element model (FEM) computing the mechanical responses of the buried gas pipeline subjected to frost heave load was established and successfully validated with the results of a large-scale indoor pipe-soil interaction experiment carried out in Caen in France. Utilizing C# language and object-oriented visual programming techniques, a new customized parametric strain calculation software was developed. The effects of pipe diameter, pipe wall thickness, pipe internal pressure, and peak soil resistance on the longitudinal strain of X60, X70, and X80 steel pipes have been investigated quantitatively. For the first time, a fitting semiempirical equation and trained backpropagation neural network (BPNN) for predicting pipeline strain demand subjected to frost heave load were proposed based on 2688 groups of FEM results. The comparison results have proved their high accuracy and lower running time cost. The proposed new methods can be applied in the strain-based pipeline design and safety evaluation of pipelines in service. It is in the hope of supplementing existing theory and identifying new approaches for arctic gas pipeline installations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".