MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4220981841 · doi:10.3389/fsoil.2022.812249

Estimating Mineral-Associated Organic Carbon Deficits in Soils of the Okanagan Valley: A Regional Study With Broader Implications

2022· article· en· W4220981841 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Soil Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsSoil waterSiltSoil carbonTotal organic carbonOrganic matterSoil organic matterEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceEnvironmental chemistrySoil textureSorptionChemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To successfully reduce atmospheric CO 2 by sequestering additional soil carbon, it is essential to understand the potential of a given soil to store carbon in a stable form. Carbon that has formed organo-mineral complexes with silt and clay particles is believed to be less susceptible to decay than non-complexed, or particulate, organic carbon. Using direct measurements of mineral associated organic matter (MAOC) on a subset of samples, and an approach developed previously for primarily allophanic soils, we took a modeling approach to estimate MAOC for 537 samples of much coarser and younger soils from 99 non-cultivated and agricultural sites in the Okanagan Valley, British Columbia, Canada. Using specific surface area (SSA) or soil texture as indicators of the mineral surface area available for sorption of organic matter, we used both Random Forest (RF) and Stepwise Multiple Regression with Akaike Information Criterion (SMR) to determine a best fit model for predicting MAOC. Random Forest modeling using SSA in addition to total SOC, exchangeable calcium, exchangeable potassium, and soil pH performed better than SMR for determining MAOC in these soils ( R 2 : 0.790 for RF; R 2 : 0.713 for SMR). To determine if a MAOC deficit existed for these soils, we then applied a quantile regression approach wherein the predicted 90th quantile of MAOC represents the MAOC formation capacity. We determined that MAOC deficits were present in all soils and increased with depth. Moreover, clay rich soils had greater MAOC deficits (1.62 g kg −1 for 0–15 cm, 4.01 g kg −1 for 15–30 cm, and 5.80 g kg −1 for 30–60 cm), than sandier soils (1.01 g kg −1 for 0–15 cm, 2.72 g kg −1 for 15–30 cm, and 3.69 g kg −1 for 30–60 cm). Furthermore, the upper 30 cm of these soils have the potential to increase MAOC stocks by 29% (48.0 million kg of MAOC over 8,501 ha) before they reach formation capacity. This study highlights the variability in MAOC formation capacity of soils with different physicochemical properties and provides a framework for estimating MAOC concentrations and deficits for soils with a wide range of physicochemical properties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it