Short-Axis PET Image Quality Improvement by Attention CycleGAN Using Total-Body PET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The quality of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is positively correlated with scanner sensitivity, which is closely related to the axial field of view (FOV). Conventional short-axis PET scanners (200-350 mm FOV) reduce the imaging quality during fast scanning (2-3 minutes) due to the limitation of FOV, which reduce the reliability of diagnosis. To overcome hardware limitations and improve the image quality of short-axis PET scanners, we propose a supervised deep learning model, CycleAGAN, which is based on a cycle-consistent adversarial network (CycleGAN). We introduced the attention mechanism into the generator and focus on channel and spatial representative features and supervised learning using pairs of data to maintain the spatial consistency of the generated images with the ground truth. The imaging information of 386 patients from Henan Provincial People's Hospital was prospectively included as the dataset in this study. The training data come from the total-body PET scanner uEXPLORER. The proposed CycleAGAN is compared with traditional gray-level-based methods and learning-based methods. The results confirm that CycleAGAN achieved the best results on SSIM and NRMSE and achieved the closest distribution to ground truth in expert rating. The proposed method is not only able to improve the image quality of PET scanners with 320 mm FOV but also achieved good results on shorter FOV scanners. Patients and radiologists can benefit from the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system integrated with CycleAGAN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".