Heterogeneous gradient computing optimization for scalable deep neural networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, data processing applications based on neural networks cope with the growth in the amount of data to be processed and with the increase in both the depth and complexity of the neural networks architectures, and hence in the number of parameters to be learned. High-performance computing platforms are provided with fast computing resources, including multi-core processors and graphical processing units, to manage such computational burden of deep neural network applications. A common optimization technique is to distribute the workload between the processes deployed on the resources of the platform. This approach is known as data-parallelism. Each process, known as replica, trains its own copy of the model on a disjoint data partition. Nevertheless, the heterogeneity of the computational resources composing the platform requires to unevenly distribute the workload between the replicas according to its computational capabilities, to optimize the overall execution performance. Since the amount of data to be processed is different in each replica, the influence of the gradients computed by the replicas in the global parameter updating should be different. This work proposes a modification of the gradient computation method that considers the different speeds of the replicas, and hence, its amount of data assigned. The experimental results have been conducted on heterogeneous high-performance computing platforms for a wide range of models and datasets, showing an improvement in the final accuracy with respect to current techniques, with a comparable performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it