MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221057352 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-35.1.27

Entropy scale factor may explain gravity, dark matter, and the expansion of space

2022· article· en· W4221057352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGeneral relativityClassical mechanicsDark matterTime dilationGravitationTheoretical physicsAstrophysicsTheory of relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The entropy scale factor (ESF) is a novel theory proposing that the scale of time and space change depending on entropy, and that this change underlies special relativity, gravity, and the expansion of space. In special relativity, as the relative velocity of objects increases, there are more possible combinations of momentum and position within the moving frame due to the uncertainty principle. This increase in possible microstates represents an increase in entropy, which can be correlated with the time dilation and length contraction of special relativity. The ESF predicts that an observer in an empty region of space taking measurements near an entropic object will measure time to run more slowly and lengths to appear longer in the direction of entropy. These changes in scale would warp of spacetime, causing gravity. For objects with low acceleration, gravity can be approximated by the time dilation component only. For a single star, this approximation predicts a gravitational field similar to that of Newtonian gravity. For a constellation of stars, the ESF predicts that gravity will be stronger than in Newtonian gravity, because time dilation is added as a scalar sum, instead of the vector sum used in Newtonian gravity. Adding fields as a scalar sum avoids the cancelling out that comes with vectors pointed in different directions, leading to increased gravitational acceleration. This effect could explain galaxy rotation dynamics and the gravitational lensing of galaxies without the need for dark matter. Additionally, the ESF would cause space to expand as the entropy of the universe increases. This is because the entropy of a spherical boundary changes only the radial dimension, so as the entropy encoded on the boundary increases time within the boundary slows down more quickly than the volume decreases. Given the constant speed of light, an observer inside such a boundary will experience the increasing volume to time ratio as the expansion of space. Accordingly, the rapid increase in entropy in the early universe would cause a rapid expansion of space, possibly explaining the homogeneity of the large-scale structure of the universe without the need for inflation. In our recent universe, the increasing rate of entropy production due to black holes may explain the accelerating expansion of space, without the need for dark energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it