MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221057352 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-35.1.27

Entropy scale factor may explain gravity, dark matter, and the expansion of space

2022· article· en· W4221057352 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Christopher N. Watson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGeneral relativityClassical mechanicsDark matterTime dilationGravitationTheoretical physicsAstrophysicsTheory of relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The entropy scale factor (ESF) is a novel theory proposing that the scale of time and space change depending on entropy, and that this change underlies special relativity, gravity, and the expansion of space. In special relativity, as the relative velocity of objects increases, there are more possible combinations of momentum and position within the moving frame due to the uncertainty principle. This increase in possible microstates represents an increase in entropy, which can be correlated with the time dilation and length contraction of special relativity. The ESF predicts that an observer in an empty region of space taking measurements near an entropic object will measure time to run more slowly and lengths to appear longer in the direction of entropy. These changes in scale would warp of spacetime, causing gravity. For objects with low acceleration, gravity can be approximated by the time dilation component only. For a single star, this approximation predicts a gravitational field similar to that of Newtonian gravity. For a constellation of stars, the ESF predicts that gravity will be stronger than in Newtonian gravity, because time dilation is added as a scalar sum, instead of the vector sum used in Newtonian gravity. Adding fields as a scalar sum avoids the cancelling out that comes with vectors pointed in different directions, leading to increased gravitational acceleration. This effect could explain galaxy rotation dynamics and the gravitational lensing of galaxies without the need for dark matter. Additionally, the ESF would cause space to expand as the entropy of the universe increases. This is because the entropy of a spherical boundary changes only the radial dimension, so as the entropy encoded on the boundary increases time within the boundary slows down more quickly than the volume decreases. Given the constant speed of light, an observer inside such a boundary will experience the increasing volume to time ratio as the expansion of space. Accordingly, the rapid increase in entropy in the early universe would cause a rapid expansion of space, possibly explaining the homogeneity of the large-scale structure of the universe without the need for inflation. In our recent universe, the increasing rate of entropy production due to black holes may explain the accelerating expansion of space, without the need for dark energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics EssaysSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207