Approximate Likelihood Inference in Generalized Linear Models with Censored Covariates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In many surveys and clinical trials, we obtain measurements on covariates or biomarkers that are left-censored due to the limit of detection. In such cases, it is necessary to correct for the left-censoring when studying covariate effects in regression models. The expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm is widely used for the likelihood inference in generalized linear models with censored covariates. The EM method, however, requires intensive computation involving high-dimensional integration with respect to the covariates when the dimension of the censored covariates is large. To reduce such computational difficulties, we propose and explore a Monte Carlo EM method based on the Metropolis algorithm. The finite-sample properties of the proposed estimators are studied using Monte Carlo simulations. An application is also provided using actual data obtained from a health and nutrition examination survey. Journal of Statistical Research 2021, Vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 359-375
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it