MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223475882 · doi:10.1080/87559129.2022.2039689

Oxidation and Thermal Degradation of Oil during Frying: A Review of Natural Antioxidant Use

2022· review· en· W4223475882 on OpenAlexafffund
Maxwell D. Erickson, Dmytro P. Yevtushenko, Zhen‐Xiang Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Reviews International · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicEdible Oils Quality and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
KeywordsAntioxidantDegradation (telecommunications)Food sciencePulp and paper industryEnvironmental scienceEdible oilVegetable oilChemistryOlive oilProcess (computing)Human healthBiochemical engineeringComputer scienceOrganic chemistryEngineeringMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frying foods in hot vegetable oil is an efficient and convenient method for food preparation that imbues the product with qualities that are desirable to consumers. During the process of frying, the heated oil cooks the food, but the high temperatures also promote the damaging oxidation and degradation reactions that decrease oil quality over time. In order to prevent these reactions, antioxidants have been added to fryer oil to extend its life. Synthetic antioxidants are typically added to fryer oil, however there is growing concern about their long-term effects on human health. Therefore, finding natural alternatives is an important area of research. This paper reviews the current research around using natural antioxidants to delay the decrease of oil quality under frying conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Reviews InternationalSame topicEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207