Empirical Remote Sensing Algorithms to Retrieve SPM and CDOM in Québec Coastal Waters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In most coastal waters, riverine inputs of suspended particulate matter (SPM) and colored dissolved organic matter (CDOM) are the primary optically active constituents. Moderate- and high-resolution satellite optical sensors, such as the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat-8 and the MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) on Sentinel-2, offer a synoptic view at high spatial resolution (10–30 m) with weekly revisits allowing the study of coastal dynamics (e.g., river plumes and sediment re-suspension events). Accurate estimations of CDOM and SPM from space require regionally tuned bio-optical algorithms. Using an in situ dataset of CDOM, SPM, and optical properties (both apparent and inherent) from various field campaigns carried out in the coastal waters of the estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence (EGSL) and eastern James Bay (JB) ( N = 347), we developed regional algorithms for OLI and MSI sensors. We found that CDOM absorption at 440 nm [ a g (440)] can be retrieved using the red-to-green band ratio for both EGSL and JB. In contrast, the SPM algorithm required regional adjustments due to significant differences in mass-specific inherent optical properties. Finally, the application of regional algorithms to satellite images from OLI and MSI indicated that the atmospheric correction (AC) algorithm C2RCC gives the most accurate remote-sensing reflectance ( R rs ) absolute values. However, the ACOLITE algorithm gives the best results for CDOM estimation (almost null bias; median symmetric accuracy of 45% and R 2 of 0.78) as it preserved the R rs spectral shape, while tending to yield positively bias SPM (88%). We conclude that the choice of the algorithm depends on the parameter of interest.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".