DeepVelo: Deep Learning extends RNA velocity to multi-lineage systems with cell-specific kinetics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1 Abstract The introduction of RNA velocity in single-cell studies has opened new ways of examining cell differentiation and tissue development. Existing RNA velocity estimation methods rely on strong assumptions of predefined dynamics and cell-agnostic constant transcriptional kinetic rates, which are often violated in complex and heterogeneous single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. To overcome these limitations, we propose DeepVelo, a novel method that estimates the cell-specific dynamics of splicing kinetics using Graph Convolution Networks (GCNs). DeepVelo generalizes RNA velocity to cell populations containing time-dependent kinetics and multiple lineages, which are common in developmental and pathological systems. We applied DeepVelo to disentangle multifaceted kinetics in the processes of dentate gyrus neurogenesis, pancreatic endocrinogenesis, and hindbrain development. The method infers time-varying cellular rates of transcription, splicing and degradation, recovers each cell’s stage in the underlying differentiation process, and detects functionally relevant driver genes regulating these processes. DeepVelo relaxes the constraints of previous techniques, facilitates the study of more complex differentiation and lineage decision events in heterogeneous scRNA-seq data, and is more computationally efficient than previous techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".