Controlling the degree of observability in GPS/INS integration land-vehicle navigation based on extended Kalman filter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental setup implements the concept of degree of observability (DoO) adequate a land-vehicle navigation application with noised inertial measurement unit (IMU) and global positioning system (GPS) sensors based on a loosely coupled approach. The navigation systems such as IMU-GPS require extensive evaluations of nonlinear equations as used in an extended Kalman filter (EKF). According to DoO and during our test, we have implemented a method for measuring the DoO of all states continuously. Where, the results showed that applying the fusion IMU-GPS system based on EKF be enhanced the DoO measure. The real dataset consists of outputs a high sampling rate for IMU sensor at each (0.01s) and GPS receiver at each (1s). In addition, an aloft category IMU was put together with differential GPS (DGPS) information to produce a real trajectory. GPS has acceptable long-term accuracy, it is used to update the position and velocity in IMU outputs before processing in the EKF algorithm. The implementation consists of three main algorithms: Strapdown (dead reckoning DR), DoO and EKF algorithms. The results are shown, implementation of both approaches based on EKF and the concept of DoO in GPS/INS integrated systems are sufficient robustness to use with low-cost sensors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".