MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224232894 · doi:10.1080/15481603.2022.2060596

Gap-filling MODIS daily aerosol optical depth products by developing a spatiotemporal fitting algorithm

2022· article· en· W4224232894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGIScience & Remote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMinistry of Innovation and Advanced Education
KeywordsModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerRemote sensingResidualAerosolEnvironmental sciencePixelAtmospheric correctionSpectroradiometerImage resolutionSmoothingAlgorithmMeteorologyComputer scienceGeographyMathematicsSatelliteArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aerosol loadings and their spatial distribution are among the most important atmospheric information needed for a range of applications such as air quality monitoring, climate research, and public health. A key measure of aerosol quantity is aerosol optical depth (AOD) and it has been routinely observed from space by Earth observing satellites/instrument, especially the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS). Despite its global coverage and daily temporal resolution, the MODIS Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) AOD product is fraught with missing values, severely limiting its use. A gap-filling method which is suitable for large-area application with high efficiency to obtain gapless AOD with reasonable spatial pattern and complete coverage is still lacking. Here, we proposed a novel spatiotemporal fitting algorithm to gap-fill the daily MODIS AOD product. Our algorithm is a multi-stage method aimed to address the non-stationary nature of AOD time series. First, the trend of daily AOD in a year in each pixel was fitted via smoothing splines and the residual was derived based on the original data and the trend. Second, the residual was spatially interpolated, leveraging the spatial correlation between the target pixel and the neighboring pixels. Third, the actual AOD was calculated as the sum of the trend and interpolated residual. We tested the algorithm against ground-based AOD data from 2011 to 2018 in China and further evaluated it via cross-validation at the global scale based on 10 selected MODIS tiles. Compared to the ground-reference AOD, the RMSE of our gapless datasets were 0.24 and 0.27 for Terra and Aqua, respectively; and the cross-validation showed a RMSE ranging from 0.045 to 0.055 (Terra) and 0.047 to 0.057 (Aqua) under different missing ratios. The novel gap-filling method outperforms the Interpolation-based Correlation Weighting (ICW) and Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) algorithms in accuracy. Meanwhile, the gapless AOD using the novel algorithm shows lower accuracy than original MAIAC AOD, similar accuracy with the AOD from the Long-term Gap-free High-resolution Air Pollutants (LGHAP) concentration dataset, higher accuracy than the AOD from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). Overall, the accuracy of gapless AOD using this algorithm meets the need of typical applications in relevant studies. The proposed algorithm is transferable to other regions, with the potential to be used even operationally and efficiently for generating accurate gapless global daily AOD datasets with the input of only MODIS MAIAC AOD data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it