MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224863607 · doi:10.1142/s0129167x22500422

Linear instability of Sasaki Einstein and nearly parallel G2 manifolds

2022· article· en· W4224863607 on OpenAlexafffund
Uwe Semmelmann, Changliang Wang, M. Y.-K. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mathematics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometry and complex manifolds
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBetti numberMathematicsEinsteinInstabilityHomology (biology)Pure mathematicsSpace (punctuation)Mathematical analysisCombinatoricsMathematical physicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the stability problem for the Einstein metrics on Sasaki Einstein and on complete nearly parallel [Formula: see text] manifolds. In the Sasaki case we show linear instability if the second Betti number is positive. Similarly, we prove that nearly parallel [Formula: see text] manifolds with positive third Betti number are linearly unstable. Moreover, we prove linear instability for the Berger space [Formula: see text] which is a [Formula: see text]-dimensional homology sphere with a proper nearly parallel [Formula: see text] structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of MathematicsSame topicGeometry and complex manifoldsFrench-language works237,207