MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225533213 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3166665

Evaluation of LiDAR-Derived Snow Depth Estimates From the iPhone 12 Pro

2022· article· en· W4225533213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarSnowMean squared errorRemote sensingComputer scienceMathematicsEnvironmental scienceAlgorithmMeteorologyStatisticsPhysicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Snow is a critical contributor to the global water-energy budget with impacts on springtime flooding and water resource management practices. Laser altimetry [light detection and ranging (LiDAR)] is a remote-sensing technique that has demonstrated skill in monitoring snow depth, but the expense of purchasing and transporting traditional LiDAR equipment limits their operational use. In this work, we demonstrate that the LiDAR sensor installed on the Apple iPhone 12 Pro consumer smartphone is a real-time, handheld measurement instrument for accurately observing changes in snow depth. Two independent field experiments in Southern Ontario, Canada, found that the iPhone LiDAR was able to accurately capture daily changes in snow depth when compared to <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">in situ</i> snow ruler measurements. <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">In situ</i> and LiDAR comparisons of xs <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n=75$ </tex-math></inline-formula> days at measurement site A exhibit a correlation of <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$r &gt; 0.99$ </tex-math></inline-formula> , mean absolute bias less than 1 mm, and a root mean squared error (RMSE) of approximately 6 mm. A similar positive agreement was also noted at the second field study site for <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$n=16$ </tex-math></inline-formula> measurements over the same period. The high accuracy of the LiDAR sensor suggests that a mobile application could be developed which allows users to quickly scan a snow-covered area before and after a snowfall event and consequently use this data to aid in filling current observational gaps through a citizen-science-based approach to measuring changes in snow depth.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it