Joint Task Offloading and Resource Allocation for Fog-Based Intelligent Transportation Systems: A UAV-Enabled Multi-Hop Collaboration Paradigm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have been widely used in Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) due to their rapid deployment and high mobility, which are considered as a promising solution to expand the scope of communication, especially in inaccessible areas. However, there is a lack of a universal and extensible multi-hop collaboration model in the existing research on UAV-involved ITS. In this paper, we innovatively introduce a novel UAV-enabled multi-hop collaborative fog computing (FC) system model, in which several moving UAVs with unpredictable locations provide effective and efficient communication and computation services for ground user equipments (UEs). With this model, we mathematically formulate a joint user association, UAV association, task offloading, transmission power, computation resource allocation, and UAV location optimization problem, which is a mixed integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem and challenging to deal with. To solve the non-convex problem, we propose a novel multi-hop collaborative algorithm to derive the optimal task offloading and resource allocation decisions for each UAV. Simulation results demonstrate the superiority of the UAV-enabled multi-hop collaborative FC system and validate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".