MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225731917 · doi:10.55549/epess.1051080

Integrating STEM in to TVET Education Programs in QATAR: Issues, Concerns and Prospects

2021· article· en· W4225731917 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHigher Education Learning Practices
Canadian institutionsCollege of the North Atlantic
FundersQatar National Research FundFonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
KeywordsVocational educationCurriculumGovernment (linguistics)PerceptionHuman capitalPublic relationsPolitical scienceMedical educationEconomic growthPsychologyPedagogyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Qatar TVET education system faces unique challenges in that the percentage of vocational secondary school students constitute only 1.4% compared to world average of 15% due to the poor perception of TVET as lesser pathway than other academic-based education. This low perception is associated with sociocultural, economic and institutional factors. Another challenge is the poor link between vocational and general education and the link to labor market. Further challenge is how TVET institutions can develop new curricula, which can respond to the needs of the 21st century skills. This paper will discuss how STEM can help promote TVET education and what are the possible changes required to overcome those challenges. A survey on “Improving and enriching the Human Capital of the State of Qatar through Identification and Development of 21st Century Skills”, explored perceptions of both employers and TVET program leaders toward the skills needed for economic and social developments in a changing world by Meeting Human Capital Needs through 21st Century Skills including the perceptions on needed STEM and cognitive skills. A total of 85 managers and professionals (from more than forty establishments) completed the survey, together with 35 TVET program leaders located in one national university and six government TVET institutions together with 32 semi structured interviews. Descriptive statistics analysis showed a major mismatch between the perceptions of TVET program leaders and employers’ managers and professionals in many aspects., employers perceive the social skills as more important while TVET consider mathematical reasoning as more important employers perceive technological skills such as digital literacy as more important than what TVET leaders perceive. This presentation will identify several approaches to integration and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches employed. The presentation addresses the various planning approaches and resources required to effectively integrate STEM in TVET programs and curricula.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.372
Threshold uncertainty score0.535

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it