PMRQ: Achieving Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Multidimensional Range Query in eHealthcare
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Healthcare data explosion and cloud computing booming have motivated healthcare centers to outsource their healthcare data and data-driven services to a powerful cloud. Nevertheless, due to privacy concerns, the data are usually encrypted before being outsourced, which will degrade the data utility and make it challenging to implement data-driven services. Although the multidimensional range query over encrypted data, as one of the most popular outsourced services in eHealthcare, has been extensively studied, existing solutions still have some limitations in efficiency, privacy, and practicality. Aiming at this challenge, in this article, we design an efficient and privacy-preserving multidimensional range query (PMRQ) scheme. We first build an R-tree to index the data set and reduce the R-tree-based range queries to the multidimensional range intersection problem. Then, by delicately designing a data comparison algorithm and a homomorphic encoding technique, we present an encoding-based range intersection algorithm. After that, by employing matrix encryption to protect the privacy of the encoding-based range intersection algorithm, we design a multidimensional range intersection predicate encryption (MRIPE) scheme. Based on the MRIPE scheme, we then propose our PMRQ scheme. A detailed security analysis illustrates that our PMRQ scheme is privacy preserving, and experimental results demonstrate that it is computationally efficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".