MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225900855 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2022.3159760

Non-Parametric Belief Propagation Solver for Stochastic Systems of Linear Equations

2022· article· en· W4225900855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicSolverBelief propagationParametric statisticsMathematical optimizationPartial differential equationStochastic partial differential equationProbabilistic analysis of algorithmsFinite element methodApplied mathematicsMonte Carlo methodAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The striking growth of powerful computing resources allows time-efficient solution of computationally demanding problems. In particular, advances in high-performance computing have made stochastic approaches to real-world applications more practical. The belief propagation (BP) algorithm is a probabilistic method typically used in information theory and artificial intelligence. This article exploits the probabilistic message passing attribute of BP for solving stochastic linear systems that naturally arise from finite element formulation of stochastic partial differential equations (PDEs), establishing an explicit connection between the two fields for the first time. The accuracy of the algorithm is validated by comparison to the well-known Monte Carlo method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it