MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4225900855 · doi:10.1109/tmag.2022.3159760

Non-Parametric Belief Propagation Solver for Stochastic Systems of Linear Equations

2022· article· en· W4225900855 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Akbari, Dennis D. Giannacopoulos

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Magnetics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceProbabilistic logicSolverBelief propagationParametric statisticsMathematical optimizationPartial differential equationStochastic partial differential equationProbabilistic analysis of algorithmsFinite element methodApplied mathematicsMonte Carlo methodAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The striking growth of powerful computing resources allows time-efficient solution of computationally demanding problems. In particular, advances in high-performance computing have made stochastic approaches to real-world applications more practical. The belief propagation (BP) algorithm is a probabilistic method typically used in information theory and artificial intelligence. This article exploits the probabilistic message passing attribute of BP for solving stochastic linear systems that naturally arise from finite element formulation of stochastic partial differential equations (PDEs), establishing an explicit connection between the two fields for the first time. The accuracy of the algorithm is validated by comparison to the well-known Monte Carlo method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on MagneticsSame topicProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignFrench-language works237,207