A Web Intelligence Solution to Support Recommendations from the Web
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Big data are everywhere. World Wide Web and social networks are examples of these big data. They have become a vast data production and consumption platform, at which threads of data evolve from multiple devices, by different human interactions, over worldwide locations, under divergent distributed settings. Embedded in these big web data is implicit, previously unknown and potentially useful information and knowledge that awaited to be discovered. This calls for web intelligence solutions, which make good use of data science, data mining (especially, web mining) and social network analysis to discover useful knowledge and important information from the web (e.g., web of people/things). Such a web often consists of vertices (i.e., people/things) and edges (i.e., connections among people/things). When modeling a social network as a web of people, these edges can be undirected (e.g., for mutual friendships) or directed (e.g., for capturing a social entity who is following another social entity). In this paper, we present a web intelligence solution to discover interesting knowledge (e.g., most-followed people or most-referenced web pages) from these social connections. Due to the dynamic nature of the web, vertices and/or edges may be changed (e.g., added or deleted) over time. Hence, our solution is designed in such a way that it discovers knowledge not only from a static web but also from a dynamic web. Evaluation on real-life web data demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of our solution for discovering knowledge and supporting recommendations from the web.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it