MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Rapid UAV Path Planning

2022· article· en· W4226322432 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMotion planningRobustness (evolution)Fitness functionGenetic algorithmComputer scienceObstacleSwarm behaviourPath (computing)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsRobotMachine learningGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract UAV technologies have advanced rapidly and are widely used in military and civilian fields. For instance, the UAV swarms have been widely applied to oil and gas exploration, geometric mapping, and cargo transport. However, the UAV swarm system requires a more accurate plan before performing any mission. Path planning is one of the essential parts of mission planning because of the higher requirement of robustness and real-time communication. UAV path planning could generate the optimal path starting from the current position to the target in an environment with an obstacle. While the standard genetic algorithm has lacked efficiency in the iteration process and poor stability, a new genetic operator is proposed for the genetic algorithm and applied to the path planning simulation of UAV swarms in this study. A three-dimensional mapping and fitness function are already constructed for the simulation. The simulation result shows the algorithm with improved selection and mutation operator can efficiently and stably converge to the optimal solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it