MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226368115 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.2.002

The effect of e-service quality on user satisfaction and loyalty in accessing e-government information

2022· article· en· W4226368115 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Munawar Noor

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSMEs Development and Digital Marketing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoyaltyBusinessService qualityQuality (philosophy)The InternetService (business)Government (linguistics)Structural equation modelingComputer user satisfactionPublic sectorMarketingInformation qualityInformation systemWorld Wide WebComputer scienceUser experience designUser interface designEngineeringEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Digitization has had a profound impact on changing consumer behavior and the reorientation of online services by service providers in both the public and private sectors. This includes the use of information and communication technology and the internet adopted in the public sector largely known as e-government, which intensifies the use of websites to bridge the relationship between public institutions and users. The purpose of the study was to analyze the effect of e-service quality on user loyalty through user satisfaction of public service websites. The study was conducted on 250 users of public service websites in Indonesia. The analytical tool used is Structural Equation Modeling with the help of AMOS software. The study found that the quality of e-service has a significant effect on user satisfaction and user loyalty, user satisfaction has a significant effect on user loyalty, and user satisfaction partially mediates the effect of e-service quality on user loyalty. The results of the study underscore the importance of improving the quality of e-government through e-quality services, especially in government organizations to provide opportunities for the public and the private sector to access government services with integrated services efficiently through the use of the internet and online channels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicSMEs Development and Digital MarketingFrench-language works237,207