The Application of Graph Neural Network in Natural Language Processing and Computer Vision
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Graphs can represent information transformation via geometrical relations, which have been well studied and applied in various research areas. A graph-based learning network named Graph Neural Network (GNN) arose with the vast development of deep learning in recent years. Unlike traditional deep learning networks such as CNN and RNN, GNN is superior in dealing with non-Euclidean graph data. This survey focuses on two widespread application fields of GNN, natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision (CV). Firstly, based on the tasks they perform, we categorize the most popular research sub-domains of NLP and CV, purpose a detailed review on the application of GNN in these areas. Secondly, we thoroughly analyzed the benchmark datasets applied in the GNN models while comparing them with different evaluation metrics. Finally, we briefly discuss the potential future direction of GNN according to its model building procedure and related application branches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it