MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226452241 · doi:10.1109/twc.2022.3157885

Mean-Field Artificial Noise Assistance and Uplink Power Control in Covert IoT Systems

2022· article· en· W4226452241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsEricsson (Canada)York University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStackelberg competitionArtificial noiseComputer scienceCovertComputer securityTransmission (telecommunications)Telecommunications linkSecrecyGame theoryWirelessComputer networkChannel (broadcasting)TransmitterTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study a covert Internet of Things (IoT) system. Compared with conventional IoT systems that apply cryptography and information-theoretic secrecy approaches to secure the transmission, our considered IoT system adopts the covertness technique and intends to hide the legitimate transmission from the observant adversaries. In the IoT system, the IoT devices randomly transmit the collected data to their associated IoT gateways (GWs). In the meantime, the adversaries attempt to detect the existence of legitimate transmission based on their received signal power and launch hostile attacks accordingly. To avoid being detected by the adversaries, the IoT system applies uplink power control to achieve covert legitimate transmission. Moreover, to distort the observation of the adversaries so as to mislead their decisions, we propose an artificial noise (AN)-assisted covert communication design, where the AN is transmitted by in-band full-duplex (IBFD) IoT GWs as a jamming operation. We formulate a Stackelberg game to study the interaction between the adversaries and the legitimate entities including the IoT GWs and IoT devices, where the legitimate entities, as the leaders, decide on the powers of legitimate and AN transmissions at the upper level and the adversaries, as the followers, aim to minimize their detection errors at the lower level. Thereafter, considering the large scale of IoT system, we further cast the Stackelberg game into a mean-field Stackelberg game and incorporate the stochastic geometry and statistical channel model to capture the location heterogeneity and channel dynamics among and of the system entities, respectively. In the performance evaluation, we verify the practicability of the mean-field Stackelberg game. Moreover, we demonstrate the effectiveness of AN in improving the transmission covertness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.794
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it