Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Britain's geology is perhaps more diverse than any equivalent area in the world, spans almost 3 billion years, and has been studied for more than two centuries yet, for too long, it seemed that we could find no evidence here for one of the most spectacular events on the Earth—a giant meteorite impact. Perhaps, the only evidence might be localized and easily overlooked, like the thin layer of millimetre‐scale microtektites, once molten beads of rock blasted out by an impact, found near Bristol in 2001. Alas, these proved actually to have originated more than a thousand kilometres from Britain, in the 100 km Manicouagan Crater in eastern Canada. However, just a few years later, a spectacular discovery revealed that a world‐class impact deposit, metres thick and extending for tens of kilometres, had been hiding in plain sight at a location visited by countless geology students and their teachers. For decades, the Assynt region in northwest Scotland has been a training ground for geologists, drawn by the immensely old Lewisian Gneiss, the spectacular hills of Torridon sandstone that overlie it, and the structural complexity of the Moine Thrust Zone. How could this remarkable impact deposit have gone unnoticed for so long?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it