Covid-19: theatre goes digital – provocations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter delves into the intricate dynamics of the mother-child bond during and after maternal incarceration, using Ethiopia as its locus. It examines the various forms of contact—permanent, partial, and broken—between incarcerated mothers and their children, analysing the implications through the lens of attachment theory. The harsh conditions of Ethiopian prisons, characterised by overcrowding and inadequate resources, are explored for their impact on these relationships. The chapter also highlights the cultural context of Ethiopia, where strong maternal roles and extended family structures are prevalent, adding complexity to the experience of incarceration. By comparing the outcomes of children who remain with their mothers in prison versus those who are separated, the chapter underscores the need for alternative measures to imprisonment, such as non-custodial sentences. It also stresses the importance of considering the child's best interests in legal decisions regarding imprisonment. The chapter concludes by advocating for policies that balance the benefits of maintaining physical proximity with the mother against the potential psychological and developmental harms of the prison environment. By focusing on the Ethiopian context, the chapter provides valuable insights into the broader challenges of incarceration and family dynamics, advocating for a nuanced understanding of the legal, social, and cultural factors that influence the mother-child bond during and after incarceration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it