MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4226510577 · doi:10.1109/tie.2022.3165305

Hybrid Active–Passive Robust Control Framework of a Flexure-Joint Dual-Drive Gantry Robot for High-Precision Contouring Tasks

2022· article· en· W4226510577 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)ContouringComputer scienceNonlinear systemMotion controlIterative learning controlRobotEngineeringControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For high-precision contouring tasks in a typical Cartesian motion system, multiaxis cooperation is a long-standing challenging issue. Inevitably, various factors pose substantial difficulty in the multiaxis cooperation leading to degraded contouring performance, such as the strong coupling effect between different axes, nonlinearity, the unknown dynamics due to the friction, and the difficulties in accurate system identification. To enhance the contouring performance of a flexure-joint dual-drive gantry system against the aforementioned issues, this article presents a hybrid active–passive robust control framework leveraging a model-free architecture. In this control scheme, all the coupling effects, nonlinearity, disturbance, and unknown dynamics are considered as “lumped uncertainty”. Then, a super-twisting sliding mode control method with a signum-type iterative learning law is proposed to passively suppress the lumped uncertainty during iterations; and an extended state observer is deployed to actively compensate the lumped uncertainty and ensure the establishment of sliding motion in the time domain. As supported by theoretical analysis, the proposed controller is shown to exhibit several important properties. First, the establishment of the sliding motion is guaranteed globally, in both the time domain and the iteration domain. Second, the properties of short establishment time of the sliding motion, fast convergence during the iterations, and low chattering are achieved. Moreover, a series of comparative experiments are conducted, and the proposed method is shown to be rather effective in achieving excellent contouring performance in the high-speed and complex-curvature contouring tasks, without relying on the system model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it