Scheduling High Multiplicity Jobs on Parallel Multi-Purpose Machines with Setup Times and Machine Available Times
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the scheduling of high multiplicity jobs on parallel multi-purpose machines with setup times and machine available times, with the objective of minimizing makespan. High multiplicity means that jobs are partitioned into several groups and in each group all jobs are identical. Whenever there is a switch from processing a job of one group to a job of another group, a setup time is needed. Multi-purpose machine implies that each job can only be processed by a specific subset of all the machines, called processing set. A mixed integer programming is formulated for this NP-hard problem. A heuristic is proposed to solve the problem. Lower bounds are developed to evaluate the heuristic algorithm. Extensive numerical computations are performed and the results show that the heuristic generates solutions with makespan within 2% above the lower bounds in average, and outperforms CPLEX 12.6 for large scale and complex problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it