Efficient and Privacy-Preserving Proximity Detection Schemes for Social Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the pervasiveness of location-aware mobile terminals and the popularity of social applications, location-based social networking service (LBSNS) has brought great convenience to people's life. Meanwhile, proximity detection, which makes LBSNS more flexible, has aroused widespread concern. However, the prosperity of LBSNS still faces many severe challenges on account of users' location privacy and data security. In this paper, we propose two efficient and privacy-preserving proximity detection schemes, named arbitrary geometric range query for polygons (AGRQ-P) and arbitrary geometric range query for circles (AGRQ-C), for location-based social applications. With proposed schemes, a user can choose any area on the map, and query whether her/his friends are within the region without divulging the query information to both social application servers and other users, meanwhile, the accurate locations of her/his friends are also confidential for the servers and the query user. Specifically, with algorithms based on ciphertext of geometric range query, users' query and location information is blurred into ciphertext in client, thus no one but the user knows her/his own sensitive information. Detailed security analysis shows that various security threats can be defended. In addition, the proposed schemes are implemented in an IM APP with a real LBS dataset, and extensive simulation results over smart phones further demonstrate that AGRQ-P and AGRQ-C are highly efficient and can be implemented effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".