MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4230275575 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2003.820223

Thermal Problems Caused by Harmonic Frequency Leakage Fluxes in Three-Phase, Three-Winding Converter Transformers

2004· article· en· W4230275575 on OpenAlexaff
James A. Forrest, B. Allard

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsTeshmont (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeakage inductanceTransformerEnergy efficient transformerElectrical engineeringDistribution transformerElectromagnetic coilRotary variable differential transformerIsolation transformerMaterials scienceTransformer effectDelta-wye transformerElectrical impedanceEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harmonic frequency leakage flux can be a limiting factor in three-phase, three-winding HVDC converter transformers. Investigation of a three-phase, three-winding 240-MVA converter transformer failure indicated the failure was caused by harmonic fluxes. Calculations indicated that the magnitudes of these harmonic fluxes to be approximately 45% of the power frequency leakage flux for the transformer, and are little affected by the transformer impedance or the converter firing angle. A study of the failed transformer loading during its life was made and a calculation made of the hot spot temperature considering various insulation half-life factors. Based on published information on insulation half-life factors it was estimated that at full load the hot spot temperature of the transformer was about 159/spl deg/C. From examination of the insulation in the hot spot area, this estimate of hot spot temperature was considered reasonable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207