MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4231494664 · doi:10.1353/sgo.2017.0001

Editors’ Introduction

2017· article· en· W4231494664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoutheastern geographer · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographerRacismXenophobiaScholarshipSociologyPoliticsMedia studiesHistoryGender studiesPolitical scienceGeographyLawCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Editors’ Introduction Hilda E. Kurtz and Deepak R. Mishra In Volume 57, Issue 1 of the Southeastern Geographer, we are pleased to offer readers a special issue on “Black Geographies in and of the United States South” guest edited by Adam Bledsoe, LaToya Eaves and Brian Williams, with a commentary by Katherine McKittrick. The special issue showcases conceptually innovative research grounded in a Black Geographies perspective on the racialized production of physical, political and imagined space(s). This issue goes to press two days after a deeply divisive American Presidential election has made it much harder to deny the racism and xenophobia that have threaded through the fabric of the United States for centuries. The Southeastern Geographer has a long record of engagement with race, racism and xenophobia through scholarship on urban segregration, Jim Crow policies, contestation over Confederate memorials, struggle over the Confederate battle flag, regional tourism, immigration and many other empirics. Review of the 55 year archive of the journal through Project MUSE (ProjectMUSE.com) suggests that the Southeastern Geographer may have a higher proportion of work wrestling with race and racism than any other geography journal publishing today. (A thematic resource list of these papers can be accessed from sedaag.org). Conceptual and analytical approaches to race and racism in geography have changed significantly over the years, growing more critical, theoretical and supple over time; these developments are readily on view in the pages of this journal. Against this scholarly backdrop, the Black Geographies scholarship offered in this issue of Southeastern Geographer pushes the critical edge further ahead. Our hope is that these papers stimulate ever more nuanced and critical engagement with some of the most pressing issues of our time. Canadian geographer Katherine McKittrick (Queen’s University) and the late Clyde Woods (UC Santa Barbara) outlined the conceptual apparatus of Black Geographies in an edited volume published in the aftermath of the 2005 superstorm Hurricane Katrina. The lens of Black Geographies counters the ways in which predominantly white-authored scholarship tends to render black spaces and spatial practices as somehow deficient, and guides more open-ended inquiry into Black constructions of spaces that recognize complex spatial survival and resistance strategies in changing conditions of racial bias. The papers in this issue of Southeastern Geographer each contend with historical/ geographic conditions in and of the American South. We leave it to the guest editors to introduce each paper in relation to the aims and intentions of the special issue, but wish to underscore two key themes emerging from this project. First, as [End Page 4] recent turbulent and tragic events in cities across the United States clearly demonstrate, racism is a national, not a regional problem. At the same time, Southern states figure complexly in broader understandings of racialization. The textured array of research showcased here complicates the role of southern histories and geographies in relation to broader narratives of Black Geographies. Second, critical perspectives on race and racialization are vital to the ongoing enrichment of academic geography. The guest editors offer the journal’s readership the stimulating opportunity to envision how critical research agendas centered on a Black sense of place might push the proverbial envelope of critical race research in geography. It has been a great pleasure to work with the editors and authors whose work makes this an especially memorable issue of the journal. We hope that readers will find the work gathered here to informative and invigorating, as have we. Lastly, during our tenure as co-editors, we aim to balance annual special issues between research in human geography and research in physical geography. To that end, we have a special issue focused on submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in the southeastern coastal zone in the works for next year. As always, we invite proposals for cross-cutting special issue topics. [End Page 5] Hilda E. Kurtz University of Georgia Deepak R. Mishra University of Georgia Copyright © 2017 Southeastern Division of the Association of American Geographers

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it