MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4232114287 · doi:10.1145/1370888

Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on Software architectures and mobility

2008· paratext· en· W4232114287 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicService-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePresentation (obstetrics)Theme (computing)Variety (cybernetics)SoftwareSoftware developmentMiddleware (distributed applications)Process (computing)Software engineeringEngineering managementWorld Wide WebTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the First International Workshop on Software Architectures and Mobility (SAM 2008). The theme of this year ICSE is Driving World Business, acknowledging the crucial role the engineering of software plays in a variety of sectors, from business to health care, from telecommunications to embedded systems. Mobility stands out as an orthogonal dimension to most of these application domains: consider, for example, the outburst of m-commerce applications, or the use of pervasive computing technologies to deliver healthcare services in the future. The goal of this workshop is to strengthen the cross-fertilization of advances from requirements and domain engineering, software architectures, and middleware to systematically develop and evolve architectures supporting mobility. SAM gives software engineering researchers and practitioners a unique opportunity to facilitate information exchange, share ideas, and promote collaboration. The call for papers attracted both full and short papers from researchers in Asia, Canada, Europe and the United States. The program committee conducted a rigorous reviewing process, at the end of which 6 full papers and 6 short papers were accepted for presentation and discussion at the workshop. In addition, the program includes a keynote speech by Nenad Medvidović, from the University of Southern California. We hope that these proceedings will serve as a valuable reference for researchers and developers in the field of software architectures and mobility from institutions around the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.215

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0640.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicService-Oriented Architecture and Web ServicesFrench-language works237,207