MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233110004 · doi:10.1109/tdc.1996.545952

Specification, performance, testing and qualification of extra-heavy-duty connectors for high-voltage applications

2002· article· en· W4233110004 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. Lam, R. Morin

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 1996 Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exposition · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical Contact Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringDuty cycleDependency (UML)Surface roughnessVoltageComputer scienceSurface finishEngineeringPower (physics)Automotive engineeringElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceSystems engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reliability of substation connectors is a constant concern for electrical utilities and represents one of the weak links of Hydro-Quebec's 735 kV power system. This paper describes some of the early findings of current-cycling tests on 4000 kcmil aluminum cable connectors and defines the need for more stringent qualification test specifications. Use of the ANSI C119.4 light-duty (125 cycles) test specification revealed a strong dependency on basic parameters such as surface roughness, dimension, type and surface finish of hardware, surface preparation, mounting techniques, etc. The first batch of test samples failed dramatically at an early stage in the current and load cycling tests. Some recommendations are formulated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of 1996 Transmission and Distribution Conference and ExpositionSame topicElectrical Contact Performance and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207