MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4233953722 · doi:10.23952/jnva.2.2018.1.05

Two simple relaxed perturbed extragradient methods for solving variational inequalities in Euclidean spaces

2018· article· en· W4233953722 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nonlinear and Variational Analysis · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSimple (philosophy)Variational inequalityEuclidean geometryMathematicsApplied mathematicsInequalityPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldCalculus (dental)Mathematical optimizationMathematical analysisGeometryMedicineEpistemologyPhilosophyOrthodontics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Korpelevich's extragradient method is an iterative method designed for solving the variational inequality problem (VIP) and also can be used for other problems, such as finding saddle-points. The method employs two orthogonal projections onto the feasible set of the VIP per each iteration. This method was studied intensively and many generalizations and extensions were proposed along the years. Censor et al. proposed some modifications of the method in Euclidean as well as in Hilbert spaces, including a perturbed version which allows projections onto the members of an infinite sequence of subsets that epi-converges to the feasible set of the VIP. In this paper study this extragradient variant and extend it further to two relaxed and perturbed algorithms by using the properties of the involved operators and the perturbed sets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.584

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it