MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Food Science Education Publications and Websites

2008· article· en· W4233991938 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Food Science Education · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicDiverse Educational Innovations Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumPurchasingLibrary scienceSubject (documents)Medical educationPsychologyComputer scienceMarketingBusinessPedagogyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bird The purpose of this column is to highlight innovative publications and websites in food science education. If you know of a website or a recent publication that you believe other readers would like to know about, please submit the full text of the article or the URL for the website and an annotation of not more than 125 words. We welcome your resources and comments on this column. Material should be submitted to: Jim Bird, Science & Engineering Center, Fogler Library, Univ. of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, or e-mail to Jim.Bird@umit.maine.edu. If e-mailing, please put “JFSE submission” in the subject line. Angell DL. 2008. Food safety education as a risk management strategy. J Extension 46(1): article nr 1T0T5. http://www.joe.org/joe/2008february/tt5p.shtml (accessed 8/13/2008). This article briefly describes a program of The Ohio State Univ. (OSU) Extension on safe food handling for those “. . .Extension staff and volunteers involved with food programs or events.” (abstract) This program involves participants using The Original Safe Food Handling for Occasional Quality Cooks curriculum. A pre/post survey showed a significant increase in food safety knowledge by participants in the program. Information on purchasing this curriculum on cd-rom can be found at http://estore.osu-extension.org/ by searching by title for “safe food handling.” Hughes LJ. 2007. Creating a farm and food learning box curriculum for preschool-aged children and their families. J Nutr Ed Behav 39(3):171–2. The “From Our Farms” curriculum for children 3 to 8 y old developed by Rutgers Univ. Extension focuses on locally-grown food consumption and the promotion of nutrition. Instructional material is provided through family fun pages and activity sheets which are combined with instructional materials to form Learning Boxes. To find out more about this curriculum, visit http://gloucester.rcre.rutgers.edu/fchs/fromourfarms.html Kinder CA. 2008. Connecting local food systems to youth. J Extension 46(1): article nr 1IAW3. http://www.joe.org/joe/2008february/iw3p.shtml (accessed 8/13/2008) The author, an Area 4-H/Youth Extension Educator, briefly describes a camp for youth (ages 8 to 13) in south central Idaho. One of the purposes of the camp is for campers to gain knowledge of local food systems. Through the use of guest speakers and workshops on trail mix production, management, and by-products, campers learn about food systems and careers associated with these systems. Life skill enhancement including reading, measuring, and problem solving was an integral part of the campers' experience. McBroom R and Oliver-Hoyo MT. 2007. Food enzymes. The Sci Teach 74(7):58–63. Noting that high school biology and chemistry are often taught in such as way as to reinforce the view that students have that these sciences are unrelated, the authors developed laboratory, inquiry-based activities involving the food enzymes hydrolase and oxidoreductase. The article includes 2 student handouts and solution preparation as well as detailed commentary on procedures, results, and valuable information for teachers as students work through the activities. PLANTfacts. Horticulture & Crop Science in Virtual Perspectives. The Ohio State Univ. http://plantfacts.osu.edu/web/ (assessed 8/13/2008) This searchable database includes factsheets from 46 U.S. and Canadian universities and government institutions. As noted in a previous column, cooperative extensions are excellent sources of food science and nutrition information for educators. This site also includes a searchable database on research and training which includes 40 university departments. A search on food education finds over 1800 matches. A list of extension and university websites searched can be found at http://hcs.osu.edu/plantfacts/web/fs/list.html U.S. Dept. of Labor. 2008–2009. Agricultural and food scientists. Occupational Outlook Handbook. http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos046.htm (accessed 8/13/2008) The Occupational Outlook Handbook is a key resource for students and others to explore career options. It is updated yearly and contains a wealth of information about occupations. A typical entry includes information on the nature of the work, training, job outlook, earnings, and related careers. The Handbook is fully searchable. This url directs the user to agricultural and food scientists. Use http://www.bls.gov/oco to view and search the Handbook.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it