MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235228143 · doi:10.1109/wsc.2018.8632430

PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT IN OPERATING AUTONOMOUS PLANTS SUBJECT TO RANDOM BREAKDOWNS IN CONSTRUCTION

2018· article· en· W4235228143 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrewProductivityProduction (economics)Resource (disambiguation)Function (biology)Maintenance engineeringOperating costRelevance (law)Computer scienceOperations researchEngineeringReliability engineeringAeronautics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Realizing continuous operations of autonomous plants subject to finite specialist crew resources for maintenance and repair is vital to achieving productivity and cost-effectiveness in construction operations. This paper presents a practical Monte Carlo simulation-based method to develop autonomous plants operations and maintenance programs. To balance the cost of plant production loss against the cost of hiring maintenance crews, we define a cost function which factors in production output value, resource utilization efficiency and direct cost in connection with both autonomous plants and maintenance crews. An illustration case of planning maintenance crew resources in operating autonomous crushing plants at a quarry site is used to shed light on required input data, simulation processing, and output analysis. The case also has increasing relevance to the construction industry in the near future in terms of planning the operation of a fleet of autonomous equipment in site operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it