MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4235539439 · doi:10.15803/ijnc.6.2_149

A Practical Algorithm for Embedding Graphs on Torus

2016· article· en· W4235539439 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Networking and Computing · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Graph Theory Research
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorusEmbeddingComputer scienceTime complexityImplementationExponential functionGraph embeddingAlgorithmGraphTheoretical computer scienceExponential growthMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embedding graphs on the torus is a problem with both theoretical and practical importance. It is required to embed a graph on the torus for solving many application problems such as VLSI design, graph drawing and so on. Polynomial time and exponential time algorithms for embedding graphs on the torus are known. However, the polynomial time algorithms are very complex and their implementation has been a challenge for a long time. On the other hand, the implementations of some exponential time algorithms are known but they are not efficient for large graphs in practice. To develop an efficient practical tool for embedding graphs on the torus, we propose a new exponential time algorithm for embedding graphs on the torus. Compared with a well used previous exponential time algorithm, our algorithm has a better practical running time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.944
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it